Radioactive dating cold environmemt Free chat pantyhous

Rated 3.85/5 based on 788 customer reviews

That’s just over half a percent error in something that is supposedly multiple billions of years old.Of course, that error estimate is complete nonsense.In this report, for example, we are told that using one radioactive dating technique, a lunar rock sample is 4,283 million years old, plus or minus 23 million years old.In other words, there is a 95% certainty that the age is somewhere between 4,283 23 million years and 4,283 – 23 million years.ratio having remained the same over the preceding few thousand years.

This is best illustrated by the radioactive age of a sample of diamonds from Zaire.One of the basic assumptions in carbon-14 dating is that the sample being analyzed has undergone only radioactive decay and has remained unaltered by any other process over the years since it ceased interaction with the biosphere. The archaeological artifacts and geological specimens sent to labs for radiocarbon dating are usually found embedded or buried with other materials that may have affected their radiocarbon content.Any carbon-containing material that affects the carbon 14 content of any given sample is therefore a contaminant.As someone who has studied radioactivity in detail, I have always been a bit amused by the assertion that radioactive dating is a precise way to determine the age of an object.This false notion is often promoted when radioactive dates are listed with utterly unrealistic error bars.

Leave a Reply